Search This Blog

Monday, February 7, 2011

Mapping the Mindsets of Resilience and Recovery


Resilience has become a buzz-word for a group of behaviors that enable an individual to withstand, or recover quickly from, adversity or difficult conditions. A lot of attention has been paid by researchers to the study of individuals who demonstrate great resilience in the face of trauma, in the hope that a model of resilience can be developed and taught.

In my research into the interaction between behavior, our DNA and the environment I was drawn to the work of neuro-plasticians (scientists who study the brain’s ability to change itself) like Edward Taub and Michael Merzenich, and quantum biologists Pjotr Gariaev and Vladimir Popponin.

While Gariaev and Popponin investigate how our environment switches DNA on or off, Taub and Merzenich have dedicated their lives to understanding how the nervous system responds to signals from the environment, learns new skills, and develops habits.

It seems it all boils down to a dynamic neurological process where the mind creates maps for how it responds to signals coming from the senses. There are maps for everything we do, hear, see, feel, taste and smell. These maps contain the precise sequence and location of neurons (cells) in the brain as they are fired. The more we are exposed to something, and respond in a similar way, the more defined and refined these maps become. And the more of our brain it owns. We have maps for walking, for holding a ball or gripping a cup, and we have maps for our emotions, for what triggers feelings of love, sadness, fear, anger or arousal.

Someone who is good at playing piano will have a bigger map for the movement of their fingers and hands than a soccer player, for instance. While the soccer player would have more of their brain devoted to the nuances of moving the body, legs and feet than would the pianist.

Mind maps draw on abilities we have inherited from our parents, that are the best fit for a particular experience or stimulus coming from our environment. This explains why we can carry a gene for depression and anxiety, but if we do not experience sustained bullying as a child, this gene may not be called on. Meanwhile if we are taught functional ways to handle aggression and conflict, these skills will instead become the basis of a mind map.

If this mind map is reinforced over and over again by practice and experience, there is a good chance it will be laid down in the DNA as an alternative code, which can be passed onto future generations. A parent who copes well with conflict and aggression is also more likely to teach these skills to their offspring, further reinforcing the resilient behaviour. Over multiple generations this reinforcing of a healthy response to aggression and conflict may lead to a dominant trait in descendants, that predispose them to resilience.

This brilliant, new research over-turns both the ‘dominance of the gene’ and ‘brain localization’ theories, proving the dynamic interplay between genetic material and our experience of the world through our senses.

Resilient individuals can be said to have highly functional maps, that provide a strong pattern for the nervous system to rely upon, as well as being able to break these maps down when they are no longer useful and replace them with better response maps.

Positively charged emotions like gratitude, love, acceptance and joy produce dopamine and endorphins that help lay down new mind-maps, as well as oxytocin that helps dissolve old mind maps. This is important because it is only at the point of acceptance in the cycle of grieving that individuals are able to finally let go of what was lost and move on. We now know why, acceptance promotes the production of the very brain chemical that melts away old mind maps and allows new mind maps to supersede them.

Experiencing a reward for new behaviour also triggers more dopamine, helping to reinforce connections between neurons, strengthening a new map. Fear, on the other hand, shuts down the nervous system and DNA, leaving us with only the most primitive maps to fall back on. This explains why fear and anxiety can render us speechless and unable to respond. Soldiers are trained to overcome this through the repetition of skills under extreme pressure, and through receiving rewards for the desired, resilient behaviour.

The amazing thing about these maps is they are three dimensional, and stored holographically within the nervous system and DNA. But even more amazingly they are plastic, and highly susceptible to change. This new evidence is changing the way medicine rehabilitates stroke victims and brain injury patients, leading to a virtual rewiring of damaged brains around dead cells. The key to this new model of rehabilitation is to re-learn skills for the damaged limb, motor skill or brain function as if for the first time, step-by-step, like a baby, and by providing a reward for each incremental improvement. In this way patients with catastrophic damage have regained almost full function of motor-skills, despite a prognosis they would never recover.

Our brains are built to be resilient, they are built to handle changing circumstances and they are built to recover. All that has held us back in the past was an entrenched mindset that dictated the contrary, so we treated people as broken clocks with pieces missing, rather than dynamic organisms with built in redundancy and a great capacity for change.

Educators, work-place trainers, rehabilitation experts and managers have much to learn and much to look forward to from the application of this fascinating science to the real world.

Friday, December 31, 2010

Altruism a Genetic Advantage?

So, it's New Year's Day, and just like billions of other people around the world today, I've been reflecting on the past year and the choices I've made. I've also spent some time scanning the pages and pages of genetic studies I've collected on my hard-drive and I re-found an interesting study on altruism, which I've decided to make a theme for today's blog. I wish you all a very Happy New Year, and hope you make the most of time off with family and friends.


Lis


PS My latest newsletter has been designed to help you refine your New Year's Resolution and make the most of 2011.  To find out more click on the link below:
New Years Resolution Tool Kit - Our gift to you, see details: the bucket revolution http://conta.cc/e22Ulr via #constantcontact

Altruism - a Genetic Advantage?

The idea that our genes are selfish and the concept of survival of the fittest as the only genetic imperative, has been seriously questioned by recent studies into genetics and behavior. As more of our so called 'junk DNA' is understood, it appears that this area contains very complex molecular protections, and is also more mutable than long believed. It appears that these junk codes are influenced by triggers from the environment and as such are subject to change.

It seems that when a behaviour offers an adaptive advantage it is encoded and past on through the genes. One possible explanation for this phenomenon is that massive amounts of DNA codes lie silently and act as a kind of substrate of potential that can be drawn on under the right conditions. In some cases it seems this substrate can be taken apart and re-combined in new codes, sometimes mimicking codes copied from viruses, or other cell invaders.

The amount of code in the substrate makes up 90% of our genetic material. Each cell in the human body contains about 2 meters of genetic material, with a storage capacity of about 3 gigabytes of information. It has been estimated that the average human adult has 210 trillion bytes of storage capacity, thanks mainly to this junk DNA.

Quantum and molecular biologists are now referring to this junk DNA as the Dark Matter of the genome, because of its volume and potential.  It's almost like an internal 'Akashic Library.'

Psychology and Quantum biology are now forced to overlap, as it seems every behavior has its roots in the domain of our DNA, and is switched on and off by environmental exposure; that is the influence of family and society.

The great thing is the most recent findings show that we are not at the mercy of selfish genes. We have choice when it comes to expressing our behavioral potential, and we have choice in the way we nurture our children and each other to bring out the best in them.

I think this is my favorite part of all this research, because it's increasing our ability to understand ourselves. It also shows us that we are 'co-creators' in the deepest sense. Not in some New Age fluffy throw away line, but at the root of who we are and who the generations to come will choose to be.

Below, I include an interesting study showing why selfishness and survival of the fittest has not always won the day, enjoy!


'Selfless' Genes Attract Mates, Psychologists Find ScienceDaily (Oct. 14, 2010) — There is genetic evidence that selfless or altruistic behaviour may have evolved because it was one of the qualities our ancestors looked for in a mate.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the finding of Dr Tim Phillips and colleagues from the University of Nottingham and Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London whose results were published in the British Journal of Psychology.


The study investigated whether altruistic behaviour evolved as a result of sexual selection. 70 identical and 87 non-identical female twin pairs completed questionnaires relating to their own levels of altruism (e.g. "I have given money to charity") and how desirable they found this in potential mates (e.g. "Once dived into a river to save someone from drowning").

Statistical analysis of their responses revealed that genes influenced variation in both the subjects' preference towards a mate and their own altruistic behaviour -- an indication that sexual selection might be at work.


Interestingly, there was also a genetic correlation between the two. This suggested that, in our evolutionary past, those with a stronger mate preference towards altruistic behaviour mated more frequently with more altruistic people, thus further supporting a link with sexual selection.


Tim explained: "These results are consistent with a link between human altruism towards non-relatives and sexual selection and throws an exciting new light on the puzzle of altruistic behaviour -- which appears, at first sight, to be at odds with evolutionary theory."


"The expansion of the human brain would have greatly increased the cost of raising children so it would have been important for our ancestors to choose mates both willing and able to be good, long-term parents. Displays of altruism could well have provided accurate clues to this and so led to a link between human altruism and sexual selection."

Story Source:
The above story is reprinted (with editorial adaptations by ScienceDaily staff) from materials provided by British Psychological Society (BPS), via AlphaGalileo.

Friday, November 26, 2010

I've been thinking about the Energy Bucket concept and learning, and realizing that we are on the cusp of an education revolution. Last night, over dinner with my partner and business manager, the ramifications of this model really started to sink in. Nothing like good company, good food and a lovely view of the Clyde River to get the quantum leaps in thinking happening.

We were discussing how the new science around the interaction of DNA, personality, behavior and  environment will impact the way future generations learn. The hypothesis was that in the future this new way of understanding the mind will liberate students and teachers alike from the limitations of previous learning models.

Combined with powerful online learning tools,  we may finally be able to treat each student as an individual and respond to their needs more appropriately. For some this may mean that they are able to complete 12 years of education in 6. For others it will mean they can get specific assistance in areas of need, or accelerated learning in areas of aptitude.

It's my mission to bring this information to public consciousness and thereby provide parents, teachers and educationalists with tools to understand and manage differences in personality, learning styles, energy levels and attitude within themselves and their  students.

Which brings me to a study I found recently about how what we say about others says more about us than the people we are actually judging.

A new study (excerpt below) shows that our own emotional maturity and happiness determines how we judge others. Many children are labeled at a young age by a teacher as difficult, unwilling to learn, or unable to keep up. According to a study published in August this year in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology - what we say about others, and how we judge them says a lot more about us. It is a reminder that anyone in a position of authority should take care how they label those in their care.

This ties in with the Energy Bucket's 6 Key Principles of Energy Management. Paying attention to the words we say and the way we talk about others and the world can tell us a lot about our charge. If as educators we are mindful of this, it can help us to see learners as individuals, and resist the temptation to label. Read on...






What You Say About Others Says a Lot About You, Research Shows

ScienceDaily (Aug. 3, 2010) — How positively you see others is linked to how happy, kind-hearted and emotionally stable you are, according to new research by a Wake Forest University psychology professor.

"Your perceptions of others reveal so much about your own personality," says Dustin Wood, assistant professor of psychology at Wake Forest and lead author of the study, about his findings. By asking study participants to each rate positive and negative characteristics of just three people, the researchers were able to find out important information about the rater's well-being, mental health, social attitudes and how they were judged by others.

The study appears in the July issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Peter Harms at the University of Nebraska and Simine Vazire of Washington University in St. Louis co-authored the study.

The researchers found a person's tendency to describe others in positive terms is an important indicator of the positivity of the person's own personality traits. They discovered particularly strong associations between positively judging others and how enthusiastic, happy, kind-hearted, courteous, emotionally stable and capable the person describes oneself and is described by others.

"Seeing others positively reveals our own positive traits," Wood says.
The study also found that how positively you see other people shows how satisfied you are with your own life, and how much you are liked by others.

In contrast, negative perceptions of others are linked to higher levels of narcissism and antisocial behavior. "A huge suite of negative personality traits are associated with viewing others negatively," Wood says. "The simple tendency to see people negatively indicates a greater likelihood of depression and various personality disorders." Given that negative perceptions of others may underlie several personality disorders, finding techniques to get people to see others more positively could promote the cessation of behavior patterns associated with several different personality disorders simultaneously, Wood says.

This research suggests that when you ask someone to rate the personality of a particular coworker or acquaintance, you may learn as much about the rater providing the personality description as the person they are describing. The level of negativity the rater uses in describing the other person may indeed indicate that the other person has negative characteristics, but may also be a tip off that the rater is unhappy, disagreeable, neurotic -- or has other negative personality traits.

Raters in the study consisted of friends rating one another, college freshmen rating others they knew in their dormitories, and fraternity and sorority members rating others in their organization. In all samples, participants rated real people and the positivity of their ratings were found to be associated with the participant's own characteristics.

By evaluating the raters and how they evaluated their peers again one year later, Wood found compelling evidence that how positively we tend to perceive others in our social environment is a highly stable trait that does not change substantially over time.

Editor's Note: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Lis Faenza has spent most of her life endeavoring to understand energy and its interaction with our DNA. Recent findings in quantum physics and quantum biology have shed light on what is going on. It's Lis' mission to bring this information to the general public. Combined with her expertise in human performance, these insights offer new approaches to our understanding of communication and learning.

To find out more about the latest research into the relationship between genes, behaviour, energy and bullying, please see "The Energy Bucket" and 'The DNA of Bullying," available as e-books from our online store at http://www.thebucketrevolution.com